621 S.E.2d 696
46 Va. App. 755
Jeremy Dion DIMAIO
v.
COMMONWEALTH of Virginia.
Record No. 2851-04-2.
Court of Appeals of Virginia, Richmond.
November 15, 2005.
       

FITZPATRICK, Judge.

Ricky L. POSEY, Appellant
v.
COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.
No. 2004-SC-0060-DG.
Supreme Court of Kentucky.
February 23, 2006.

        Opinion of the Court

STATE of Washington, Respondent
v.
Lloyd James HIGGINS, Appellant.
No. 33833-5-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
December 5, 2006.
 

PUBLISHED OPINION

106 F.3d 1069
79 A.F.T.R.2d 97-1664, 65 USLW 2571,
97-2 USTC P 50,622
UNITED STATES, Appellee,
v.
Richard W. CZUBINSKI, Defendant--Appellant.
No. 96-1317.
United States Court of Appeals,
First Circuit.
Heard Oct. 7, 1996.
Decided Feb. 21, 1997.

680 N.Y.S.2d 743
1998 N.Y. Slip Op. 10,211
Mary Lou SAUNDERS, Appellant,
v.
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON, Respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division,
Third Department.
Nov. 19, 1998.
 

        Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Dier, J.), entered July 16, 1997 in Washington County, which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellant,
v.
David NOSAL, Defendant–Appellee.
No. 10–10038.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Dec. 15, 2011. Filed April 10, 2012.

OPINION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
RONNY GETGEN, Defendant
CRIMINAL NO. 4:11-CR-00125
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dated: November 18, 2011

 
MEMORANDUM

163 F.Supp.2d 140
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,
v.
Carmine AGNELLO, et. al., Defendant.
No. 00 CR 205(NG) (RML).
United States District Court, E.D. New York.
August 13, 2001.
 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff,
v.
ANDREW KLAPPER, Defendant.
2009NY032282.
Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County.
Decided April 28, 2010.
 

        In this day of wide dissemination of thoughts and messages through transmissions which are vulnerable to interception and readable by unintended parties, armed with software, spyware, viruses and cookies spreading capacity; the concept of internet privacy is a fallacy upon which no one should rely.

The PEOPLE of the State of New York
v.
John V. ESPOSITO, Defendant.
Supreme Court, New York County,
Extraordinary Special and Trial Term.
July 26, 1989.

Page 469