Information Security

Infosec Cases

United States v. Cassim, 693 F. Supp. 2d 697 (S.D. Tex. 2010)

UNITED STATES of America,
v.
Adil R. CASSIM and Mathew D. Chow, Defendants.

Crim. No. 4:09-cr-0609.

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division.

March 12, 2010.

*698 U.S. Marshal, U.S. Pretrial SVCS., U.S. Probation, Mark McIntyre, Office of the United States Attorney, Financial Litigation, U.S. Attorney's Office, Houston, TX, Tyler Griffin Newby, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for United States of America.

U.S. v. Segal

UNITED STATES of America
v.
Michael SEGAL, Daniel Watkins, and Near North Insurance Brokerage, Inc.
No. 02 CR 112.
United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.
January 20, 2004.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Cenveo Corp. v. Copac, Inc.

Cenveo Corp. d/b/a Cadmus Whitehall Group, Plaintiff,
v.
Copac, Inc., Gerald P. Lux, Jr.,
Alan Parnell, Sheldon Rhyne,
David LaLiberte and Al Turi, Defendants.
C.A. No. 7:10-cv-01645-JMC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA SPARTANBURG DIVISION
Dated: August 15, 2011

ORDER AND OPINION

Alch v. Superior Court of the State of California for Los Angeles County

Cecile ALCH et al., Petitioners,
v.
SUPERIOR COURT of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, Respondent.
Time Warner Entertainment Company et al., Real Parties in Interest.
No. B203726.
Court of Appeal, Second District,
Division 8.
Aug. 14, 2008.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 15, 2008.
Review Denied Oct. 28, 2008. *

        SUMMARY

Apple & AT&T Mobility Antitrust Litigation

596 F.Supp.2d 1288
In re APPLE & AT&TM ANTITRUST LITIGATION.
No. C 07-05152 JW.
United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division.
October 1, 2008.

        ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT AT & TM'S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO DISMISS; DENYING DEFENDANT AT&TM'S MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT APPLE'S MOTION TO DISMISS

I. INTRODUCTION