Kelly v. Moesslang
In re the Matter of: BETTE LYN KELLY, Appellant,
v.
PETER MOESSLANG, Respondent.
No. 29210-0-III
COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISIION THREE
Dated: September 18, 2012
(Cons. w/ No. 29746-2-III)
PUBLISHED OPINION
State of Washington v. Israel
54 P.3d 1218
113 Wash.App. 243
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
David R. ISRAEL, Defendant, and
Willie James King, and each of them, Appellant.
State of Washington, Appellant/Cross Respondent,
v.
David R. Israel, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, and
Willie James King, and each of them, Defendant.
Nos. 44731-9-I, 45051-4-I, 45956-2-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
September 9, 2002.
Le Associates v. Diaz-Luong
LE & ASSOCIATES, PS, a professional service corporation, Respondent,
v.
ROBERTO DIAZ-LUONG, and LAN THI NGUYEN, husband
and wife and the marital community comprised thereof, Appellants.
No. 66695-9-I
COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE
FILED: July 9, 2012
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
State of Washington v. Grenning
169 Wash.2d 47
234 P.3d 169
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Neil GRENNING, Petitioner.
No. 81449-0.
Supreme Court of Washington,
En Banc.
Argued Sept. 15, 2009.
Decided June 17, 2010.
State of Washington v. Dingman
202 P.3d 388
149 Wn. App. 648
STATE of Washington, Respondent and Cross Appellant,
v.
Robert Corcoran DINGMAN, Appellant and Cross Respondent.
No. 34719-9-II.
No. 35949-9-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
March 10, 2009.
¶ 1 Robert Dingman appeals his conviction of 16 counts of first degree theft and 11
[202 P.3d 389]
In re Matter of Rainey
In the Matter of the Personal Restraint Petition of Shawn RAINEY, Petitioner.
No. 81244-6.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued October 29, 2009.
Decided March 11, 2010.
State of Washington v. Olson
47 Wn.App. 514
735 P.2d 1362
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Laurence M. OLSON, Appellant.
No. 16724-3-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington,
Division 1.
April 29, 1987.
Laurence M. Olson appeals from a judgment and sentence for the crime of computer trespass. He contends that this conduct did not come within the prohibition of the statute.
RCW 9A.52.110 reads as follows:
Page 515
State of Washington v. Higgins
STATE of Washington, Respondent
v.
Lloyd James HIGGINS, Appellant.
No. 33833-5-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
December 5, 2006.
PUBLISHED OPINION
Harris v. Charles
Joshua HARRIS, Petitioner,
v.
Honorable Edsonya CHARLES, Director of King County Adult Detention and City of Seattle, Respondents.
No. 61629-3-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
August 31, 2009.
¶ 1 A statute entitles felons detained before trial on electronic home monitoring to be credited for the time served. No statute entitles misdemeanants to the same credit. In view of the differences between felony and misdemeanor sentencing, we hold this distinction is rational and does not violate the Equal Protection Clause.
T–Mobile USA, Inc. v. Terry
T–MOBILE USA, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff,
v.
Sherman TERRY, et al., Defendants.
No. 3:11–cv–5655–RBL.
United States District Court,
W.D. Washington,
at Tacoma.
April 23, 2012.
ORDER GRANTING PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ENTERING PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT GEORGE COLLETT