Lazette v. Kulmatycki
Sandi Lazette, Plaintiff
v.
Chris Kulmatycki, et al. Defendant
Case No. 3:12CV2416
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Dated: June 5, 2013
ORDER
Infosec Cases
Sandi Lazette, Plaintiff
v.
Chris Kulmatycki, et al. Defendant
Case No. 3:12CV2416
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Dated: June 5, 2013
ORDER
Brian Wallace, Administrator of the Estate of Norman E. Wallace, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Biswanath Halder, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92046.
Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County.
Released: July 30, 2009.
Civil Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. CV-591169.
Affirmed.
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
DYE
v.
MECHANICAL ENTERPRISES, INC
AD-102
A10A2220
Court of Appeals of Georgia
FOURTH DIVISION
March 9, 2011
NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk's office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. (Court of Appeals Rule 4 (b) and Rule 37 (b), February 21, 2008)
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee
v.
Christopher HANNA, Appellant.
No. 247 EDA 2008.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued June 24, 2008.
Filed January 14, 2009.
OPINION:
¶ 1 Appellant, Christopher Hanna, appeals from the order entered on December 17, 2007, denying his petition to expunge. We vacate and remand.
¶ 2 The trial court summarized the facts of the case as follows:
81 F.Supp.2d 1103
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,
v.
Michael R. KENNEDY, Defendant.
No. 99-10105-01.
United States District Court, D. Kansas.
January 3, 2000.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BELOT, District Judge.
On August 25, 1999, Defendant Michael R. Kennedy was indicted for the intentional receipt of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2) (Doc. 1) and forfeiture under 18 U.S.C. § 2253. Before the court for its consideration are:
COMPUSERVE INCORPORATED, Plaintiff,
v.
CYBER PROMOTIONS, INC. and Sanford Wallace, Defendants.
No. C2-96-1070.
United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.
February 3, 1997.
This case presents novel issues regarding the commercial use of the Internet, specifically the right of an online computer service to prevent a commercial enterprise from sending unsolicited electronic mail advertising to its subscribers.
In the Matter of the Personal Restraint Petition of Shawn RAINEY, Petitioner.
No. 81244-6.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued October 29, 2009.
Decided March 11, 2010.
MIKE MALIN, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
MARTIN D. SINGER et al., Defendants and Appellants.
B237804
COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR
Filed: July 16, 2013
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
(Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC466547)
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Mary M. Strobel, Judge. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
LIGHT FOR LIFE, INC., and DAVID BYUNG KOOK KANG, Plaintiffs,
v.
OUR FIRM FOUNDATION FOR
KOREANS, INC., PAUL IM, CHANG
SUP SHIM, and JUSTIN KIM, Defendants.
No. 3:12-CV-38 (CAR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION
Dated: September 24, 2012
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS
Kelly CHRISMAN, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Respondents.
No. B184689.
Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 8.
September 12, 2007.
Kelly Chrisman appeals from the trial court's denial of his petition for a writ of mandate ordering the Los Angeles Police Department to reinstate him as a police officer. We reverse and remand for further proceedings for the limited purpose of the department's reconsideration of the proper punishment for appellant's misconduct.