Criminal

Criminal Cases

United States v. Cook

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ALEX DAVID COOK, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 12-3827
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Filed: July 30, 2013

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

        SILER, Circuit Judge. Defendant Alex Cook appeals his conviction for the receipt, possession, and distribution of child pornography. For the reasons that follow, we AFFIRM.

I.

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Hanna

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee
v.
Christopher HANNA, Appellant.
No. 247 EDA 2008.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued June 24, 2008.
Filed January 14, 2009.
      

OPINION:

        ¶ 1 Appellant, Christopher Hanna, appeals from the order entered on December 17, 2007, denying his petition to expunge. We vacate and remand.

        ¶ 2 The trial court summarized the facts of the case as follows:

USA v. Kennedy

81 F.Supp.2d 1103
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,
v.
Michael R. KENNEDY, Defendant.
No. 99-10105-01.
United States District Court, D. Kansas.
January 3, 2000.
      
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
        BELOT, District Judge.

        On August 25, 1999, Defendant Michael R. Kennedy was indicted for the intentional receipt of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2) (Doc. 1) and forfeiture under 18 U.S.C. § 2253. Before the court for its consideration are:

Chrisman v. City of Los Angeles

Kelly CHRISMAN, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Respondents.
No. B184689.
Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 8.
September 12, 2007.
 

        Kelly Chrisman appeals from the trial court's denial of his petition for a writ of mandate ordering the Los Angeles Police Department to reinstate him as a police officer. We reverse and remand for further proceedings for the limited purpose of the department's reconsideration of the proper punishment for appellant's misconduct.