Criminal

Criminal Cases

United States v. Cassim, 693 F. Supp. 2d 697 (S.D. Tex. 2010)

UNITED STATES of America,
v.
Adil R. CASSIM and Mathew D. Chow, Defendants.

Crim. No. 4:09-cr-0609.

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division.

March 12, 2010.

*698 U.S. Marshal, U.S. Pretrial SVCS., U.S. Probation, Mark McIntyre, Office of the United States Attorney, Financial Litigation, U.S. Attorney's Office, Houston, TX, Tyler Griffin Newby, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for United States of America.

U.S. v. Segal

UNITED STATES of America
v.
Michael SEGAL, Daniel Watkins, and Near North Insurance Brokerage, Inc.
No. 02 CR 112.
United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.
January 20, 2004.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

State of Washington v. Wible

STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Alvin Chester WIBLE III, Appellant.
No. 27164-8-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
August 9, 2002.

        
        Alvin Chester Wible III appeals his conviction for five counts of possession of depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct with sexual motivation. We affirm.

State of Washington v. Lopez

STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent,
v.
REGNANDO CANTO LOPEZ, Appellant.
No. 24438-5-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.
Filed: April 10, 2007.

        Appeal from Spokane Superior Court. Docket No: 03-1-03407-1. Judgment or order under review. Date filed: 01/04/2005.

People v. Lett

The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent,
v.
Gladys LETT, Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division,
Second Department.
Nov. 2, 1992.

        MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

        Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Pitaro, J.), rendered August 22, 1989, convicting her of grand larceny in the third degree, computer trespass, and offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

        ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

State of New York v. Versaggi

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
Robert VERSAGGI, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of New York.
Feb. 15, 1994.
 

OPINION OF THE COURT

        Rochester City Court has found defendant guilty of two counts of computer tampering in the second degree (Penal Law § 156.20), determining that he intentionally altered two computer programs designed to provide uninterrupted telephone[83 N.Y.2d 125] service to the offices of the Eastman Kodak Corporation (see, 136 Misc.2d 361, 518 N.Y.S.2d 553). 1 County Court affirmed, without opinion.

People v. McDougal

The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent,
v.
Andre L. McDOUGAL, Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division,
Second Department.
Nov. 6, 1995.

        MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

       Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.), rendered August 23, 1994, convicting him of bribe receiving by a public servant in the third degree, receiving reward for official misconduct in the second degree, official misconduct, and computer trespass, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.