California

California Cases

Gonzalez v. City of Fresno

RICHARD H. GONZALEZ, Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF FRESNO, TAMARA BOGOSIAN, JAMES SANCHEZ,
FRESNO POLICE DEPARTMENT, ROSS TERAGUCHI, Defendants.
1:11-cv-01458 AWI-BAM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dated: January 18, 2012

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND

Drawsand v. Cutonelli

PAMELA DRAWSAND, Plaintiff,
v.
CHRISTOPHER CUTONELLI, CHRISTOPHER CHEN, BEVERLY DANIELS-GREENBERG,
ALAMEDA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS,
ALAMEDA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFFS' DEPARTMENT, and DOES 1-7, Defendants,
No. C 13-00410 WHA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dated: May 2, 2013

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SET ASIDE JUDGMENT

INTRODUCTION

Alch v. Superior Court of the State of California for Los Angeles County

Cecile ALCH et al., Petitioners,
v.
SUPERIOR COURT of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, Respondent.
Time Warner Entertainment Company et al., Real Parties in Interest.
No. B203726.
Court of Appeal, Second District,
Division 8.
Aug. 14, 2008.
Rehearing Denied Sept. 15, 2008.
Review Denied Oct. 28, 2008. *

        SUMMARY

Apple & AT&T Mobility Antitrust Litigation

596 F.Supp.2d 1288
In re APPLE & AT&TM ANTITRUST LITIGATION.
No. C 07-05152 JW.
United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division.
October 1, 2008.

        ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT AT & TM'S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO DISMISS; DENYING DEFENDANT AT&TM'S MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT APPLE'S MOTION TO DISMISS

I. INTRODUCTION